I am a teacher. I have always wanted to be a teacher. I have taught all grades, from 1st-8th. Talk to any teacher and I'm pretty sure we all feel the same about educating children. It's our profession, our vocation, our calling, our love.
There were few job openings in the public school system when I began, so in 1984 I began teaching in parochial school. I stayed until 1995, when I made the switch to public. I was very impressed with the quality of instruction in the middle school I was assigned to. I was evaluated twice that year and the administration was very supportive. Every year since, I have been evaluated formally at least once and have had numerous "walk throughs".
Around 2003, under Cecil Picard's leadership, Louisiana began the development of Grade Level Expectations (GLEs). Professional development opportunities were provided for us to work together to ensure the successful transition. Teachers worked by grade level throughout the state to create lesson plans which addressed each of the GLEs. They were uploaded into a database at the LDOE called Making Connections. We had access to every lesson plan. We could download and use them, make changes when appropriate for our students. The LEAP and iLEAP tests were based on what we taught. We did not "teach to the test". We used the data from the tests to improve instruction, which is what standardized tests should be used for.
When we heard the Common Core State Standards were being adopted in Louisiana, teachers accepted the change. We researched the CCSS online and found Utah and North Carolina had been working on the CCSS for some time. They had developed timelines and lessons, provided resources, and had made those available for teachers from around the country to access. The Louisiana Department of Education had only provided the standards themselves which were very vague. We knew it would take time to adapt to the CCSS. We were told that 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 would be transition years. We expected that the LDOE would provide guidance, professional development opportunities, and resources as they had when we transitioned to GLEs. It was time for textbook adoptions which meant any new textbooks would have to been aligned to the new CCSS. When new standards and textbooks are involved, it takes at least a year to make and gather resources for instruction, especially in an elementary classroom. We had time, two years of transition were given to us. No problem.
But then......
Early 2012, the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) made changes to Bulletin 130. Teachers would be evaluated by a new system, COMPASS. Our evaluation would be 50% evaluation by an administrator and 50% on student achievement based on value added model (VAM) scores or Student Learning Targets (SLTs).
- If a teacher was rated effective by an administrator and students showed growth, the teacher was effective.
- If a teacher was rated effective by an administrator and students did not show the expected growth, the teacher was still effective. Every educator knows there are differences in classes from year to year. We know if the class coming up is high in ELA or low in Math for example.
- If a teacher was rated ineffective by an administrator, but the students showed growth, the teacher was still effective. The evaluator might not have seen what they wanted during the two evaluations, but the teacher achieved results.
Still, no problem until Act 1 was introduced and changes were made to Bulletin 130. Teachers now had to be effective in BOTH their evaluations and student growth.
Problems....
- We hadn't been trained in COMPASS, we didn't receive training until mid summer of 2012. Evaluators were still being trained.
- The rubric used was the same for EVERY teacher. A special ed teacher of nonverbal three year old students would be evaluated using the SAME rubric as an AP teacher in a high school. Some school districts really stepped up to help educators understand the new rubric, others just provided the rubric.
- Act 1 took away tenure, so if you and your principal did not get along, it was a possibility your evaluation could affect your ability to continue as an educator.
- The LDOE was still making changes to COMPASS in March of 2013, which meant it wasn't ready to be implemented.
- Charlotte Danielson, the author of the evaluation instrument, said the LDOE was using the rubric incorrectly.
- Teachers have been told that only 10% of us can be found "Highly Effective" before the first evaluation was conducted, before the first standardized test was administered. That's like telling students "Only 3 out of the 30 in this class can make an A."
- We were transitioning to CCSS, but the tests were still aligned to the GLEs.
Now at the end of the 2012-2013 school year, we are told 2013-2014 is NOT a transition year for CCSS. We are to implement them fully. We have no textbooks, no resources provided by LDOE, but we should have resources. Look at page 4 of this document, which is an amendment to a contract given to a New York organization to develop resources for Louisiana teachers.
http://www.boarddocs.com/la/bese/Board.nsf/files/96GLKY55BE5A/$file/AF_4-1_LDE_Contracts_Over_50K_Apr2013.pdf
Apparently $2.1M has been spent and now another $1.3M? The contract started July 1, 2011. The LDOE announce the "Classroom Support Toolbox" on February 26, 2013.
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs104/1109765654095/archive/1112550781033.html
After 19 months, it seems like this would be the best resource available, but it's not. It could be if Louisiana teachers had been given the task, not a New York organization.
We did it before. We could have done it again. After all, aren't WE stakeholders ?
Teachers are leaving the profession. Retiring or resigning. It's hard to do what you love, when every time you turn around the rules change.
I am lucky. I teach in a district which took a proactive approach. We were told early on about changes. I teach in a school that has an administrator and a curriculum coordinator that has made it their mission to help us understand the CCSS and COMPASS. Other teachers in Louisiana aren't so lucky and that's a shame.
Act 1 was found unconstitutional by the District Court Judge Michael Caldwell because there were too many items included in one act. Governor Jindal has vowed to appeal to the Louisiana Supreme Court, but just in case he loses, he has had legislators introduce new bills which address Act 1 items individually. That doesn't make them right.
Louisiana Believes is still not an appropriate name for the Louisiana Department of Education. It's not being lead by people who believe in Louisiana anymore. It's being lead by people who are public policy graduates, who believe in business models, who only care about "reform", not what works for Louisiana children.
